Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46996 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751601AbcGUIbQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jul 2016 04:31:16 -0400 From: "Benjamin Coddington" To: "hch@infradead.org" Cc: "Trond Myklebust" , "List Linux" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 24/28] Getattr doesn't require data sync semantics Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 04:32:54 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20160721082216.GA15247@infradead.org> References: <1467844205-76852-23-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> <1467844205-76852-24-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> <1467844205-76852-25-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> <20160718034847.GA1195@infradead.org> <1468817945.5273.2.camel@primarydata.com> <20160719035843.GA24437@infradead.org> <20160721082216.GA15247@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 21 Jul 2016, at 4:22, hch@infradead.org wrote: > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:03:06AM -0400, Benjamin Coddington wrote: >>>> This debug output is identical for every cycle of the loop. Have to >>>> stop for the >>>> day.. more tomorrow. >>>> >>>> Ben >>>> >>> >>> Duh??? It???s this patch: pNFS: Fix post-layoutget error handling in >>> pnfs_update_layout() >>> We have to pass through fatal errors??? I???ll fix it. >> >> That's indeed fixed it up, and generic/207 passes now. Thanks! > > So I spoke too soon in my last mail, generic/207 still fails for me > with Trond's linux-next tree, although much later in the test now. > > Does it include the changes that are supposed to fix the issue? It should -- the v2 that fixed 207 for me is 56b38a1f7c781519eef09c1668a3c97ea911f86b, the first version was e35c2a0b3cd062a8941d21511719391b64437427, I think. I'll test again too. Ben