Return-Path: Received: from mx142.netapp.com ([216.240.21.19]:20352 "EHLO mx142.netapp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751504AbcG1TgW (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:36:22 -0400 From: Anna Schumaker Subject: Re: xfstests generic/285 fails reliably on Trond's linux-next branch To: Christoph Hellwig , References: <20160721081802.GA14413@infradead.org> <20160728144641.GA28753@infradead.org> CC: Message-ID: Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:36:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160728144641.GA28753@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Christoph, On 07/28/2016 10:46 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 01:18:02AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> Now that 207 is fixed the next test starts failing.. 285 is >> the SEEK_HOLE/DATA sanity check, which might help with figuring out >> which of the recent changes introduced it. > > A week later this still fails with the linux-next branch. Plain NFSv4.2 > against a Linux/XFS server. The 285.full file documenting the failures > is attached below: > What mount options are you using? The test passes for me on xfs, btrfs, and ext4. Thanks, Anna