Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53144 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753431AbcHPRe3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:34:29 -0400 From: Jeff Layton To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: bfields@fieldses.org, hch@lst.de Subject: [RFC PATCH] nfsd: fix error handling for clients that fail to return the layout Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:34:27 -0400 Message-Id: <1471368867-29362-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Currently, when the client fails to return the layout we'll eventually give up trying but leave the layout in place. What we really need to do here is fence the client in this case. Have it fall through to that code in that case instead of into the NFS4ERR_NOMATCHING_LAYOUT case. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Note that this patch is untested, other than for compilation as I don't have a block/scsi pnfs setup on which to do so. Still, I think it makes more sense to fence clients that don't return the layout instead of just giving up. diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c index 42aace4fc4c8..596205d939a1 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c @@ -686,10 +686,6 @@ nfsd4_cb_layout_done(struct nfsd4_callback *cb, struct rpc_task *task) return 0; } /* Fallthrough */ - case -NFS4ERR_NOMATCHING_LAYOUT: - trace_layout_recall_done(&ls->ls_stid.sc_stateid); - task->tk_status = 0; - return 1; default: /* * Unknown error or non-responding client, we'll need to fence. @@ -702,6 +698,10 @@ nfsd4_cb_layout_done(struct nfsd4_callback *cb, struct rpc_task *task) else nfsd4_cb_layout_fail(ls); return -1; + case -NFS4ERR_NOMATCHING_LAYOUT: + trace_layout_recall_done(&ls->ls_stid.sc_stateid); + task->tk_status = 0; + return 1; } } -- 2.7.4