Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:39249 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754809AbcHSCEK (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2016 22:04:10 -0400 From: NeilBrown To: Steve Dickson Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:45:56 +1000 Subject: [PATCH 0/2] nfs-utils patches relating to server startup Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , Linux NFS Mailing List , Martin Pitt Message-ID: <147157095612.26568.14161646901346011334.stgit@noble> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Two patches for recently discussed functionality. Both revert earlier patches and provide a more complete solution. The first adds a new program. I've placed this in "systemd/" rather than "utils/something" because that seemed to make sense. Is it inelegant putting code in a directory with unit files? I don't do a lot of automake coding so if someone were to make sure I didn't do anything non-standard in the Makefile.am, that would be appreciated. Thanks, NeilBrown --- NeilBrown (2): systemd: improve ordering between nfs-server and various mounts mount: RPC_PROGNOTREGISTERED should not be a permanent error systemd/Makefile.am | 8 ++ systemd/nfs-server-generator.c | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ systemd/nfs-server.service | 3 - utils/mount/stropts.c | 7 +- 4 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) create mode 100644 systemd/nfs-server-generator.c -- Signature