Return-Path: Received: from fieldses.org ([173.255.197.46]:36422 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752526AbcK2UrX (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:47:23 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:47:22 -0500 To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Anna Schumaker , fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add copy_file_range() tests Message-ID: <20161129204722.GA9331@fieldses.org> References: <20160907195619.25914-1-Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> <20161026082638.GA19419@infradead.org> <20161125080509.GA6082@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20161125080509.GA6082@infradead.org> From: bfields@fieldses.org (J. Bruce Fields) Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:05:10AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 01:26:38AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 03:56:15PM -0400, Anna Schumaker wrote: > > > These tests exercise the copy_file_range() system call, and check copying > > > data to both a new file and overwriting data inside an existing file. I use > > > the xfs_io "copy_range" command for the actual copies, so running these > > > tests requires an up-to-date version of xfsprogs. > > > > Hi Anna, > > > > what's the status of these tests? Did you get a chance to look > > into xfs_io copyfile support? > > Another month, another ping - it would be really sad to not have any > real testing for copy_file_range. Agreed, Anna, are you still planning on doing this? --b. > I've been holding a pending change > for it back for month now because I want to verify it more than cursory, > but I guess I'll just have to send it anyway. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html