Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:41422 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752492AbcLFWiy (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2016 17:38:54 -0500 From: NeilBrown To: Steve Dickson , "J. Bruce Fields" Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 09:38:45 +1100 Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] Enhance /etc/nfs.conf usage and remove nfs-config.service In-Reply-To: <748c0cb1-cc3b-362a-3c97-46917dd7dabc@RedHat.com> References: <148065078775.28046.5506130555300891075.stgit@noble> <748c0cb1-cc3b-362a-3c97-46917dd7dabc@RedHat.com> Message-ID: <87oa0o4r9m.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 07 2016, Steve Dickson wrote: > On 12/01/2016 10:58 PM, NeilBrown wrote: >> This is an RFC series. A little voice at the back of my head keeps >> telling me that I'm over-engineering, but there isn't really that much >> new code, and I think the result has a lot to recommend it. >>=20 >> But please tell me if I'm wrong. >>=20 >> - Various daemons (not all) are enhance to accept configuration >> information from /etc/nfs.conf >> - the conffile reader is enhanced to support include files, and >> particularly to be able to include /etc/sysconf/X or /etc/defaults/X >> files usefully >> - nfs-config.service is removed, because it isn't really needed with >> the above. >> - documentation for all the above is provided, including a new >> nfs.systemd man page which gives the bigger picture. > This is some nice work! Its definitely a step in the right=20 > direction... IMHO... I especially like the idea of the include > statement, I'm very curious to see how that work!=20 > > If this is finished, I'll start testing and hopefully=20 > get it in... soon. I would be happy for this to go in as-is. There are certainly some changes needed (port, debug, host, etc) but they can be additions. I people are happy with the overall approach, then let's do it. Thanks, NeilBrown --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEG8Yp69OQ2HB7X0l6Oeye3VZigbkFAlhHPfYACgkQOeye3VZi gbkz1BAAn684VVPsZhVrvpSo6L+krrj+xV8QglD/WRql01dsk12VEcWl+UiiD4jc /w1v07EbFXNcbUlrN+rUl+77WuNrpQTM4HQSEe4bu2Ind0Br6w/5Qp5V/nYzOoNk u7e3toi+c4FILX3xRpbwZptwoyG0YrdVi0UZFPjRkh9NYO362yZxHcdZ1nfFhFsF tzSA/VyGRu6mehtzJ3qmuhXm9d+HznqxSrSb+D/JsDZJKl33udwlbU2UdscoCv4v XQyr9ONUPUy8f68Pug/Pwq732E1uUdZ49jDRcIbwepVmmpnUWGD3uUfpVBsII02f Em0JnS5tTbLhv2vHZ0xzBsDlUIh2m4CHrMp+vgiVwuxQZJVBsOYGFnlzirbwSADT k0Xa+rhL7WhE/0JNuUibSKrU0TQZSoav/vyJ/Gstb2AQtQJtcKyZhHjpJ7mnrLN8 7s3SzvCRV0sZMloA2kF2DEYs2aqu0Q7Sgtd4fVH3ElVe8FEI18ZMX8LOjESWR/tM d3961uQmwYNMTxqp7lIXHfcxP3Q0Exfl5N0rW2x0obtn7G2FkYjnGOuCZjcQ0pEr gdQlSK2zrvePXQHThNbIPeFUNdmVE7gQ5Ty8yXa3rTrFNGcHC7rQe2RdLR1DHEi2 5Jtk522wkklQgE8GOvj99UTpMs61opPPg160BKEh4V1ulxp/OCo= =Ga7P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--