Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:59802 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751958AbdBCNuu (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2017 08:50:50 -0500 Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 14:50:42 +0100 From: Jan Kara To: Liu Bo Cc: Jan Kara , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Petr Vandrovec , linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com, osd-dev@open-osd.org, codalist@TELEMANN.coda.cs.cmu.edu, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/24] fs: Provide infrastructure for dynamic BDIs in filesystems Message-ID: <20170203135042.GB5844@quack2.suse.cz> References: <20170202173422.3240-1-jack@suse.cz> <20170202173422.3240-5-jack@suse.cz> <20170202192827.GF6550@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20170202192827.GF6550@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu 02-02-17 11:28:27, Liu Bo wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 06:34:02PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > Provide helper functions for setting up dynamically allocated > > backing_dev_info structures for filesystems and cleaning them up on > > superblock destruction. > > Just one concern, will this cause problems for multiple superblock cases > like nfs with nosharecache? Can you ellaborate a bit? I've looked for a while what nfs with nosharecache does but I didn't see how it would influence anything with bdis... Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR