Return-Path: Received: from mx141.netapp.com ([216.240.21.12]:6246 "EHLO mx141.netapp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934271AbdBQVQF (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Feb 2017 16:16:05 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Some cleanups and updates for sunrpc To: "bfields@fieldses.org" , Trond Myklebust References: <59432847-8e45-4423-c441-0c67ee645f38@gmail.com> <20170217170313.GA9791@fieldses.org> <1487352262.11929.4.camel@primarydata.com> <20170217190926.GC10894@fieldses.org> CC: "kinglongmee@gmail.com" , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" From: Anna Schumaker Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 16:15:56 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170217190926.GC10894@fieldses.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Bruce, On 02/17/2017 02:09 PM, bfields@fieldses.org wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 05:25:04PM +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote: >> On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 12:03 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >>> Thanks, these look fine to me. >>> >>> It's really a mixture of client- and server- side stuff, but seems >>> unlikely to have serious conflicts with either. For simplicity's >>> sake I >>> think I'll just take them, unless Trond tells me he has. >>> >> >> Anna is managing the merge window for the odd-numbered kernel releases >> (Cced). > > Got it, thanks. Anna, I've currently got this queued up in my tree, but > let me know if that's a problem. I have everything applied to my tree, but I don't mind if you want to take all the patches :) > > (This every-other-kernel scheme would be easier for me to remember if > only one of you was clearly odder than the other. But I think you're > about equally odd.) Well, I guess I could try to find even more weird hobbies ... > > --b. >