Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58518 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756612AbdEKTYk (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 May 2017 15:24:40 -0400 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <68231d1a-9902-ce3d-73e3-6e74754832e4@Netapp.com> References: <68231d1a-9902-ce3d-73e3-6e74754832e4@Netapp.com> <149451118535.4599.16084557087363834548.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Anna Schumaker Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, mszeredi@redhat.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jlayton@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/14] VFS: Introduce superblock configuration context [ver #2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 20:24:32 +0100 Message-ID: <9616.1494530672@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Anna Schumaker wrote: > Is there any way to split the NFS patch into multiple pieces? Are you okay with a patch or two that add code that is unconnected in that patch, but connected in a later one? David