Return-Path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:35650 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751018AbdEMHZ7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 May 2017 03:25:59 -0400 Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 09:25:57 +0200 From: hch To: Trond Myklebust Cc: hch , "anna.schumaker@netapp.com" , "jlayton@poochiereds.net" , "bfields@fieldses.org" , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: remove function pointer casts and constify function tables Message-ID: <20170513072557.GA14602@lst.de> References: <20170512161701.22468-1-hch@lst.de> <1494620040.19467.1.camel@primarydata.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1494620040.19467.1.camel@primarydata.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 08:14:03PM +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote: > How should we proceed to merge this series? Given that it is changing a > lot of function headers, but not actually changing functionality, might > it be possible to merge it out-of-band with the merge window (e.g. next > week) in order to minimise the amount of work needed to fix up future > patches? I'd be ok with that, but someone would have to sign up to take the heat when Linus doesn't like it, and it won't be me :) Otherwiase a shared stable branch sounds fine. I can provide one for you on infradead or one of you could sign up for it.