Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59438 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751357AbdEPNg3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 May 2017 09:36:29 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 09:36:03 -0400 From: "J. Bruce Fields" To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Chuck Lever , Trond Myklebust , Steve Dickson , Linux NFS Mailing List Subject: Re: EXCHANGE_ID with same network address but different server owner Message-ID: <20170516133603.GA21704@parsley.fieldses.org> References: <20170512132721.GA654@stefanha-x1.localdomain> <20170512143410.GC17983@parsley.fieldses.org> <1494601295.10434.1.camel@primarydata.com> <021509A5-FA89-4289-B190-26DC317A09F6@oracle.com> <20170515144306.GB16013@stefanha-x1.localdomain> <20170515160248.GD9697@parsley.fieldses.org> <20170516133338.GD8498@stefanha-x1.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20170516133338.GD8498@stefanha-x1.localdomain> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 02:33:38PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > I suspect many guests will have a dedicated/private export. The guest > will be the only client accessing its export. This could simplify the > locking issues. So why not migrate filesystem images instead of using NFS? --b.