Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f174.google.com ([209.85.223.174]:35280 "EHLO mail-io0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750994AbdE3HkI (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 May 2017 03:40:08 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f174.google.com with SMTP id f102so51526008ioi.2 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 00:40:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87tw43fgrf.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> References: <87lgpkgwrw.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <20170529133814.GC17967@gardel-login> <87tw43fgrf.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> From: Michael Biebl Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 09:40:07 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] nfs.man: document incompatibility between "bg" option and systemd. To: NeilBrown Cc: Steve Dickson , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, systemd-devel@freedesktop.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 2017-05-30 0:19 GMT+02:00 NeilBrown : > +.B bg > +option is not supported, and may be stripped from the option list. Either systemd is updated to actually strip the bg option or not. The documentation should reflect that. I don't think we should be vague about this, as it would only be confusing. Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?