Return-Path: Received: from fieldses.org ([173.255.197.46]:38574 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751992AbdFHPgu (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2017 11:36:50 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 11:36:49 -0400 To: NeilBrown Cc: Steve Dickson , Lennart Poettering , systemd-devel@freedesktop.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs.man: document incompatibility between "bg" option and systemd. Message-ID: <20170608153649.GB8625@fieldses.org> References: <87lgpkgwrw.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <20170529133814.GC17967@gardel-login> <87tw43fgrf.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <89415cad-331e-bac6-7fd1-dffa058726de@RedHat.com> <87lgp4dbx7.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <2a7fd6d4-a965-02e0-3b7b-97c5743d7083@RedHat.com> <20170607120221.GJ27006@gardel-login> <87mv9jawjf.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <87mv9jawjf.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> From: bfields@fieldses.org (J. Bruce Fields) Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 03:16:52PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > So I think I've found a solution for systemd to handle "bg" nfs mounts > correctly. I'll submit some pull requests for consideration. Out of curiosity, after that change is there still any reason you'd recommend any new user actually use "bg" (as opposed to an automount)? I appreciate the effort to keep existing systems working, I'm just curious. --b.