Return-Path: Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:21081 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751093AbdFTTeN (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2017 15:34:13 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] [RFC] 64bit copy_file_range system call From: Chuck Lever In-Reply-To: <20170619193903.GA12803@infradead.org> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 15:33:39 -0400 Cc: Olga Kornievskaia , "Darrick J. Wong" , Olga Kornievskaia , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux NFS Mailing List Message-Id: <3836534F-8360-4EF4-926B-C5322A44D95E@oracle.com> References: <5bca6687-ac03-72ef-f38e-6759a0fbb1d6@gmail.com> <20170614185335.58193-1-kolga@netapp.com> <20170615035923.GA4521@birch.djwong.org> <20170615205357.GA13715@birch.djwong.org> <20170619193903.GA12803@infradead.org> To: Christoph Hellwig Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > On Jun 19, 2017, at 3:39 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 02:34:58PM -0400, Olga Kornievskaia wrote: >> Yes NFS community does need one for doing a server-to-server copy >> (performance) feature. > > s/NFS community/NetApp/ I don't have an opinion on the API details, but Oracle is interested in server-to-server copy, especially if there is an implementation of it in the Linux NFS server. -- Chuck Lever