Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.65]:40262 "EHLO elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751456AbdF0AY4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2017 20:24:56 -0400 From: "Frank Filz" To: "'J. Bruce Fields'" , "'Brian Cowan'" Cc: References: <20170623160602.GC31966@fieldses.org> <20170626173827.GE30943@fieldses.org> <20170626221233.GA2186@fieldses.org> In-Reply-To: <20170626221233.GA2186@fieldses.org> Subject: RE: 2 potentially stupid questions. Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 16:24:35 -0700 Message-ID: <007e01d2eed3$638534b0$2a8f9e10$@mindspring.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Have you added nfs-ganesha to your list of servers? > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-nfs- > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of J. Bruce Fields > Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 3:13 PM > To: Brian Cowan > Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: 2 potentially stupid questions. > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 09:09:49PM +0000, Brian Cowan wrote: > > The "feature implemented only in linux" statement worries me... Does > > this mean that only Linux's NFS client server implements this NFSv4.1 > > "lock freed" behavior? > > Actually, I shouldn't have said that. The linux (client and server) > implementation is the one I know of, but there may well be others. It's an > optional feature of NFSv4.1: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5661#section-20.11 > > If you notice 1-second-ish delays acquiring contended locks against other > servers then it may be worth filing bugs with them and suggesting they > support CB_NOTIFY_LOCK. It shouldn't be especially difficult. Adding that support to nfs-ganesha is on our todo list... Frank --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus