Return-Path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:50468 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751560AbdF1Qph (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2017 12:45:37 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 18:45:35 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Anna Schumaker Cc: Christoph Hellwig , trond.myklebust@primarydata.com, "J. Bruce Fields" , jlayton@poochiereds.net, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] nfs4: add NFSv4 LOOKUPP handlers Message-ID: <20170628164535.GA8563@lst.de> References: <20170627154403.20944-1-hch@lst.de> <20170627154403.20944-4-hch@lst.de> <99a3d554-399f-3d02-2033-3962fc00afea@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <99a3d554-399f-3d02-2033-3962fc00afea@gmail.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:55:35AM -0400, Anna Schumaker wrote: > Hi Christoph, > > On 06/27/2017 11:44 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > From: Jeff Layton > > > > This will be needed in order to implement the get_parent export op > > for nfsd. > > I think this patch conflicts with your constify and function pointer cleanups from a few weeks ago, and it may need to be updated. > > Just double checking: Bruce, are you taking the constify series for 4.13? Seems like it's in linux-next through Bruce's tree. I can respin these patches against it. Anna, Trond: are you fine with just basing the nfs tree on top of the nfsd one? Or do we want to take this series through the nfsd tree?