Return-Path: Received: from fieldses.org ([173.255.197.46]:49336 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751489AbdF1Rav (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:30:51 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:30:50 -0400 From: "J. Bruce Fields" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Anna Schumaker , trond.myklebust@primarydata.com, jlayton@poochiereds.net, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] nfs4: add NFSv4 LOOKUPP handlers Message-ID: <20170628173050.GB22508@fieldses.org> References: <20170627154403.20944-1-hch@lst.de> <20170627154403.20944-4-hch@lst.de> <99a3d554-399f-3d02-2033-3962fc00afea@gmail.com> <20170628164535.GA8563@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20170628164535.GA8563@lst.de> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 06:45:35PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:55:35AM -0400, Anna Schumaker wrote: > > Hi Christoph, > > > > On 06/27/2017 11:44 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > From: Jeff Layton > > > > > > This will be needed in order to implement the get_parent export op > > > for nfsd. > > > > I think this patch conflicts with your constify and function pointer cleanups from a few weeks ago, and it may need to be updated. > > > > Just double checking: Bruce, are you taking the constify series for 4.13? > > Seems like it's in linux-next through Bruce's tree. That's literally just your nfs-ops branch. I was assuming that's what we'd both work on top of. --b. > I can respin these patches against it. Anna, Trond: are you fine > with just basing the nfs tree on top of the nfsd one? Or do we want > to take this series through the nfsd tree?