Return-Path: Received: from fieldses.org ([173.255.197.46]:50762 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753624AbdF2Pqv (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2017 11:46:51 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 11:46:50 -0400 From: "J. Bruce Fields" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: trond.myklebust@primarydata.com, jlayton@poochiereds.net, schumaker.anna@gmail.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: open by handle support for NFS V2 Message-ID: <20170629154650.GC1651@fieldses.org> References: <20170629133453.19641-1-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20170629133453.19641-1-hch@lst.de> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 06:34:49AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > this resurrects parts of an old series to add open by handle support to > NFS. The prime intent here is to support the actual open by handle > ioctls, although it will also allow very crude re-exporting. Without > the other patches from Jeff's series that re-exporting will suck badly > though. Why do we want this? Any re-export support is going to have some major limitations. (No file locking, and re-export of NFSv4 probably not possible?) Last I heard the only motivation was extremely specific to Primary Data's setup. I'm happy to help them, but I think we need *some* evidence this will be useful to upstream users. --b.