Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw0-f173.google.com ([209.85.161.173]:35232 "EHLO mail-yw0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751247AbdFFT5d (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2017 15:57:33 -0400 Received: by mail-yw0-f173.google.com with SMTP id 141so8259887ywe.2 for ; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 12:57:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <89415cad-331e-bac6-7fd1-dffa058726de@RedHat.com> References: <87lgpkgwrw.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <20170529133814.GC17967@gardel-login> <87tw43fgrf.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <89415cad-331e-bac6-7fd1-dffa058726de@RedHat.com> From: Michael Biebl Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 21:57:32 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] nfs.man: document incompatibility between "bg" option and systemd. To: Steve Dickson Cc: NeilBrown , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, systemd-devel@freedesktop.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 2017-06-06 20:07 GMT+02:00 Steve Dickson : > Finally, the whole idea of systemd randomly/silently > strip off mount options is crazy... IMHO... Personally, I would prefer if systemd simply logged a warning/error message but would *not* strip the bg option. -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?