Return-Path: Received: from gardel.0pointer.net ([85.214.157.71]:47748 "EHLO gardel.0pointer.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751460AbdFGIX5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2017 04:23:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 10:13:13 +0200 From: Lennart Poettering To: Michael Biebl Cc: Steve Dickson , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, systemd-devel@freedesktop.org, NeilBrown Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] nfs.man: document incompatibility between "bg" option and systemd. Message-ID: <20170607081313.GI27006@gardel-login> References: <87lgpkgwrw.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <20170529133814.GC17967@gardel-login> <87tw43fgrf.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <89415cad-331e-bac6-7fd1-dffa058726de@RedHat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 06.06.17 21:57, Michael Biebl (mbiebl@gmail.com) wrote: > 2017-06-06 20:07 GMT+02:00 Steve Dickson : > > Finally, the whole idea of systemd randomly/silently > > strip off mount options is crazy... IMHO... > > Personally, I would prefer if systemd simply logged a warning/error > message but would *not* strip the bg option. What good does that do if "bg" doesn't actually work properly? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat