Return-Path: Received: from fieldses.org ([173.255.197.46]:41888 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751316AbdINRhb (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:37:31 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:37:30 -0400 From: "J . Bruce Fields" To: Steve Dickson Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, NeilBrown , Matt Benjamin , Jeff Layton , Chuck Lever Subject: Re: [PATCH nfs-utils v3 00/14] add NFS over AF_VSOCK support Message-ID: <20170914173730.GD4673@fieldses.org> References: <20170913102650.10377-1-stefanha@redhat.com> <9adfce4d-dbd7-55a9-eb73-7389dbf900ac@RedHat.com> <0a5452ff-6cb9-4336-779b-ae65cfe156b8@RedHat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <0a5452ff-6cb9-4336-779b-ae65cfe156b8@RedHat.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:55:51AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > > > On 09/14/2017 11:39 AM, Steve Dickson wrote: > > Hello > > > > On 09/13/2017 06:26 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > >> v3: > >> * Documented vsock syntax in exports.man, nfs.man, and nfsd.man > >> * Added clientaddr autodetection in mount.nfs(8) > >> * Replaced #ifdefs with a single vsock.h header file > >> * Tested nfsd serving both IPv4 and vsock at the same time > > Just curious as to the status of the kernel patches... Are > > they slated for any particular release? > Maybe I should have read the thread before replying ;-) > > I now see the status of the patches... not good! 8-) To be specific, the code itself is probably fine, it's just that nobody on the NFS side seems convinced that NFS/VSOCK is necessary. --b.