Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f196.google.com ([209.85.128.196]:35997 "EHLO mail-wr0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966733AbdIZHQU (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2017 03:16:20 -0400 From: Corentin Labbe To: trond.myklebust@primarydata.com, anna.schumaker@netapp.com, bfields@fieldses.org, jlayton@poochiereds.net, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Corentin Labbe Subject: [PATCH 2/3] nfs_common: move locks_in_grace comment at the right place Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 09:14:06 +0200 Message-Id: <20170926071407.31719-3-clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20170926071407.31719-1-clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> References: <20170926071407.31719-1-clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Commit c87fb4a378f9 ("lockd: NLM grace period shouldn't block NFSv4 opens") made the locks_in_grace() comment be in the wrong place. This patch move this comment just at the right place. Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe --- fs/nfs_common/grace.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs_common/grace.c b/fs/nfs_common/grace.c index 519396967e79..c030cd618b99 100644 --- a/fs/nfs_common/grace.c +++ b/fs/nfs_common/grace.c @@ -55,13 +55,6 @@ locks_end_grace(struct lock_manager *lm) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(locks_end_grace); -/** - * locks_in_grace - * - * Lock managers call this function to determine when it is OK for them - * to answer ordinary lock requests, and when they should accept only - * lock reclaims. - */ static int __state_in_grace(struct net *net, bool open) { @@ -78,6 +71,13 @@ __state_in_grace(struct net *net, bool open) return false; } +/** + * locks_in_grace + * + * Lock managers call this function to determine when it is OK for them + * to answer ordinary lock requests, and when they should accept only + * lock reclaims. + */ int locks_in_grace(struct net *net) { return __state_in_grace(net, 0); -- 2.13.5