Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36330 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752104AbdI0MXB (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2017 08:23:01 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 13:22:58 +0100 From: Stefan Hajnoczi To: "J. Bruce Fields" Cc: NeilBrown , "Daniel P. Berrange" , Chuck Lever , Steven Whitehouse , Steve Dickson , Linux NFS Mailing List , Matt Benjamin , Jeff Layton , Justin Mitchell Subject: Re: [PATCH nfs-utils v3 00/14] add NFS over AF_VSOCK support Message-ID: <20170927122258.GC14579@stefanha-x1.localdomain> References: <20170919164427.GV9536@redhat.com> <20170919172452.GB29104@fieldses.org> <20170921170017.GK32364@stefanha-x1.localdomain> <20170922115524.GN12725@redhat.com> <87efqu6wl4.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <20170926034026.GA19283@fieldses.org> <20170926133949.GB25286@fieldses.org> <20170926134239.GC25286@fieldses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20170926134239.GC25286@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 09:42:39AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > By the way, do we know anything about likely performance of NFS/VSOCK? virtio-vsock is designed for reliable host<->guest communication, not performance. It is not a fast-path to avoid Ethernet/IP. I haven't run benchmarks on NFS over AF_VSOCK but don't expect its performance to set it apart from virtio-net. Stefan