Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60064 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751689AbdI1Qds (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Sep 2017 12:33:48 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63C301B9EFD for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 16:33:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 17:33:46 +0100 From: Stefan Hajnoczi To: Steve Dickson Cc: Linux NFS Mailing list , "Daniel P. Berrange" Subject: Re: NFS/VSOCK Discussion Message-ID: <20170928163346.GA16038@stefanha-x1.localdomain> References: <948a3c6d-cd3c-189d-34b7-e4f78b1aa226@RedHat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <948a3c6d-cd3c-189d-34b7-e4f78b1aa226@RedHat.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:48:36AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > This discussion will be starting in 15 mins or so.... If interested. Thanks for arranging this call, it was good to get a little deeper into the requirement for vsock! Action item: * [Stefan] Send draft AF_VSOCK RFC to Linux NFS and vsock communities