Return-Path: <linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from blatinox.fr ([51.254.120.209]:41268 "EHLO vps202351.ovh.net"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1750943AbdJBAwr (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 1 Oct 2017 20:52:47 -0400
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 20:52:20 -0400
From: =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsOpbXk=?= Lefaure <jeremy.lefaure@lse.epita.fr>
To: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
        brcm80211-dev-list@cypress.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
        amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
        linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-video@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
        intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
        intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
        openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
        intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, devel@acpica.org,
        brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] use ARRAY_SIZE macro
Message-ID: <20171001205220.10b78086@blatinox-laptop.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <20171001220131.GA11812@eros>
References: <20171001193101.8898-1-jeremy.lefaure@lse.epita.fr>
        <20171001220131.GA11812@eros>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 09:01:31 +1100
"Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc> wrote:

> > In order to reduce the size of the To: and Cc: lines, each patch of the
> > series is sent only to the maintainers and lists concerned by the patch.
> > This cover letter is sent to every list concerned by this series.  
> 
> Why don't you just send individual patches for each subsystem? I'm not a maintainer but I don't see
> how any one person is going to be able to apply this whole series, it is making it hard for
> maintainers if they have to pick patches out from among the series (if indeed any will bother
> doing that).
Yeah, maybe it would have been better to send individual patches.