Return-Path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:37367 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750890AbdJBFfr (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Oct 2017 01:35:47 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 07:35:54 +0200 From: Greg KH To: =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly6W15?= Lefaure Cc: "Tobin C. Harding" , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, brcm80211-dev-list@cypress.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Jason Gunthorpe , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-video@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, devel@acpica.org, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] use ARRAY_SIZE macro Message-ID: <20171002053554.GA28743@kroah.com> References: <20171001193101.8898-1-jeremy.lefaure@lse.epita.fr> <20171001220131.GA11812@eros> <20171001205220.10b78086@blatinox-laptop.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 In-Reply-To: <20171001205220.10b78086@blatinox-laptop.localdomain> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 08:52:20PM -0400, J?r?my Lefaure wrote: > On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 09:01:31 +1100 > "Tobin C. Harding" wrote: > > > > In order to reduce the size of the To: and Cc: lines, each patch of the > > > series is sent only to the maintainers and lists concerned by the patch. > > > This cover letter is sent to every list concerned by this series. > > > > Why don't you just send individual patches for each subsystem? I'm not a maintainer but I don't see > > how any one person is going to be able to apply this whole series, it is making it hard for > > maintainers if they have to pick patches out from among the series (if indeed any will bother > > doing that). > Yeah, maybe it would have been better to send individual patches. > > From my point of view it's a series because the patches are related (I > did a git format-patch from my local branch). But for the maintainers > point of view, they are individual patches. And the maintainers view is what matters here, if you wish to get your patches reviewed and accepted... thanks, greg k-h