Return-Path: Received: from fieldses.org ([173.255.197.46]:39920 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751105AbdJMUTX (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Oct 2017 16:19:23 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 16:19:23 -0400 From: "bfields@fieldses.org" To: Trond Myklebust Cc: Thomas Haynes , "loghyr@excfb.com" , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" , "nfsv4@ietf.org" Subject: Re: pynfs replay cache test SEQ9f Message-ID: <20171013201923.GA16149@fieldses.org> References: <20171012194946.GC5233@fieldses.org> <6F78E570-F9B0-41A9-B224-3F2313AA8D4F@primarydata.com> <20171012214454.GA19598@fieldses.org> <20171012220051.GB29204@psyklo.internal.excfb.com> <20171013015223.GA21284@fieldses.org> <1507901666.4550.2.camel@primarydata.com> <20171013150021.GG5233@fieldses.org> <1507908409.9498.14.camel@primarydata.com> <20171013185015.GA15087@fieldses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20171013185015.GA15087@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 02:50:15PM -0400, bfields@fieldses.org wrote: > Those all involve uncached compounds with more than one op. My reading > of knfsd code is that it will return RETRY_UNCACHED_REP in this case, > and I think (I might be misunderstanding) that the client will bump the > slot seqid and retry in that case. So I *think* you shouldn't be seeing > that problem with knfsd? So to bring it back to the original question, I'm still not sure it's actually a problem if a server returns NFS_OK when cache_this is set differently betwen two compound calls each containing just a single SEQUENCE. But, maybe it's worth at least warning about. --b.