Return-Path: Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([140.211.166.183]:35692 "EHLO smtp.gentoo.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750726AbdKITnB (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2017 14:43:01 -0500 Subject: Re: [nfsd4] potentially hardware breaking regression in 4.14-rc and 4.13.11 To: Al Viro Cc: Linus Torvalds , Bruce Fields , "Darrick J. Wong" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux NFS Mailing List , stable , Thorsten Leemhuis References: <8fc5311b-fc56-1c19-8f63-0c509d3dd4ad@gentoo.org> <20171109193859.GC21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> From: Patrick McLean Message-ID: Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 11:42:58 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171109193859.GC21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2017-11-09 11:38 AM, Al Viro wrote: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 11:34:19AM -0800, Patrick McLean wrote: > >>> In particular, there are *no* nfsd changes in that 4.13.8..4.13.11 >>> range. There is a bunch of xfs changes, though. What's the underlying >>> filesystem that you are exporting? >> >> It's an ext4 filesystem. > > Had there been toolchain changes around the same period? > No changes, both the working and broken kernels were built with distro-provided gcc 5.4.0 and binutils 2.28.1.