Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f65.google.com ([209.85.214.65]:51231 "EHLO mail-it0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752522AbdKJONN (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Nov 2017 09:13:13 -0500 Received: by mail-it0-f65.google.com with SMTP id o135so1818393itb.0 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 06:13:13 -0800 (PST) From: Joshua Watt Message-ID: <1510323191.2495.26.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [RFC 2/4] SUNRPC: Kill client tasks from debugfs To: NeilBrown , Jeff Layton , Trond Myklebust Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro , "J . Bruce Fields" , David Howells Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 08:13:11 -0600 In-Reply-To: <87lgjeewgs.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> References: <20171108145942.5127-1-JPEWhacker@gmail.com> <20171108145942.5127-3-JPEWhacker@gmail.com> <87lgjeewgs.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2017-11-10 at 12:47 +1100, NeilBrown wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08 2017, Joshua Watt wrote: > > > The "kill" client entry in debugfs can be used to kill client > > tasks. > > Writing "0" causes only the currently pending tasks to be killed, > > while > > writing "1" all currently pending, and any future pending tasks to > > be > > killed. > > > > Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt > > --- > > net/sunrpc/debugfs.c | 48 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/debugfs.c b/net/sunrpc/debugfs.c > > index e980d2a493de..a2f33d168873 100644 > > --- a/net/sunrpc/debugfs.c > > +++ b/net/sunrpc/debugfs.c > > @@ -118,6 +118,50 @@ static const struct file_operations tasks_fops > > = { > > .release = tasks_release, > > }; > > > > +static int > > +kill_set(void *data, u64 val) > > +{ > > + struct rpc_clnt *clnt = data; > > + > > + rpc_killall_tasks(clnt, (int)val); > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int > > +kill_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) > > +{ > > + int ret = simple_attr_open(inode, filp, NULL, kill_set, > > "%i"); > > + > > + if (!ret) { > > + struct rpc_clnt *clnt = inode->i_private; > > + > > + if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&clnt->cl_count)) { > > + simple_attr_release(inode, filp); > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > + } > > + } > > + > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > +static int > > +kill_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) > > +{ > > + struct rpc_clnt *clnt = inode->i_private; > > + > > + rpc_release_client(clnt); > > + > > + return simple_attr_release(inode, filp); > > +} > > + > > +static const struct file_operations kill_fops = { > > + .owner = THIS_MODULE, > > + .open = kill_open, > > + .release = kill_release, > > + .write = debugfs_attr_write, > > + .llseek = no_llseek, > > +}; > > + > > void > > rpc_clnt_debugfs_register(struct rpc_clnt *clnt) > > { > > @@ -160,6 +204,10 @@ rpc_clnt_debugfs_register(struct rpc_clnt > > *clnt) > > if (!debugfs_create_symlink("xprt", clnt->cl_debugfs, > > name)) > > goto out_err; > > > > + if (!debugfs_create_file("kill", S_IFREG | 0200, clnt- > > >cl_debugfs, > > + clnt, &kill_fops)) > > S_IFREG is the default for debugfs_create_file, so it isn't needed. > There are about 1085 calls to debugfs_create_file() in the kernel of > which 85 specify S_IFREG. Maybe we should fix them all... > > And please use S_IWUSR rather than 0200. Oddly enough, checkpatch.pl complains if you use S_IWUSR, stating that you should use the octal instead: WARNING: Symbolic permissions 'S_IWUSR' are not preferred. Consider using octal permissions '0200'. I'm alright using S_IWUSR here since the rest of the file uses them ("when in Rome" and all that). > > I don't know if we really need this functionality if debugfs, but I > guess that is why we are putting it there - to see. Yes, I purposely constructed this patch so it could be skipped if it is unneeded/unwanted. > > Thanks, > NeilBrown > > > > + goto out_err; > > + > > return; > > out_err: > > debugfs_remove_recursive(clnt->cl_debugfs); > > -- > > 2.13.6