Return-Path: Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:53813 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752564AbdLDJzy (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 04:55:54 -0500 Subject: Re: Difficulties for compilation without extra optimisation To: Steven Rostedt , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Trond Myklebust References: <7f072f78-eef4-6d87-d233-cee71dac5a32@users.sourceforge.net> <1512314250.3673.6.camel@primarydata.com> <20171203162256.4ea0750d@vmware.local.home> <20171203214046.23b1937e@vmware.local.home> From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <513fa42d-5d4a-1b6e-3164-3f06ac6e4901@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 10:55:19 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171203214046.23b1937e@vmware.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: >> Can the software areas distinguished where such special handling matters? > > No idea. I would like to point another example out. > That's something you are going to have to figure out on your own. How do you think about information from an other clarification request for the topic “caif: Use common error handling code in cfdgml_receive()”? https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/7/486 https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10046849/ https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<034c0760-b8af-0fe2-e7a0-81199ff31931@users.sourceforge.net> Regards, Markus