Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51721 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751829AbeADUfD (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jan 2018 15:35:03 -0500 Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: nfs-utils-2.3.1 released. To: NeilBrown , Andreas Radke , Jeff Layton Cc: Linux NFS Mailing list References: <1a56bb72-cc10-ba74-2b04-4df588804ef5@RedHat.com> <20171221212516.031618d8@laptop64.home> <87a7xudx8o.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> From: Steve Dickson Message-ID: <6b5c8fb2-26eb-70bb-0320-24d243e40cd7@RedHat.com> Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 15:35:02 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87a7xudx8o.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/04/2018 12:11 AM, NeilBrown wrote: > On Thu, Dec 21 2017, Andreas Radke wrote: > >> This new version fails make check here now: >> >> nsm_client.c:147:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] >> my_prog = atoi(optarg); >> ~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> nsm_client.c:148:3: note: here >> case 'v': >> ^~~~ > > What do you think Jeff, you introduced this code 8 years ago and this > switch statement has always been broken. > Does anyone use this code? Should we fix it, it just remove it? I had the same thought... I just didn't get around to asking it... Does anybody used this v3 testing code??? If it disappeared would anybody miss it??? Neil, thanks for bring this up! steved. > > > >> make[4]: *** No rule to make target '../../support/nfs/libnfs.a', >> needed by 'nsm_client'. > > This looks like a bug in automake??? ../../support/nfs/libnfs.a is > listed as _LDADD > > https://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Program-and-Library-Variables.html#index-maude_005fAR > > which should add it to the 'ld' command, but I don't see that it should > be added as a dependency. > >> make[4]: Target 'nsm_client' not remade because of errors. >> make[3]: *** [Makefile:565: check-am] Error 2 >> make[2]: *** [Makefile:567: check] Error 2 >> statdb_dump.c: In function ‘dump_host’: >> statdb_dump.c:38:17: warning: unused parameter ‘timestamp’ [-Wunused-parameter] >> const time_t timestamp) >> ^~~~~~~~~ > > This arg has to be there because it is part of an external API. > As the function is passed as an arg to an extern function, gcc could > deduce that the signature cannot be changed just because the arg isn't > needed. > > >> statdb_dump.c: In function ‘main’: >> statdb_dump.c:91:10: warning: unused parameter ‘argc’ [-Wunused-parameter] >> main(int argc, char **argv) >> ^~~~ > > This arg doesn't need to be used (obviously) but cannot be removed. > So this is a dumb warning too. > > Maybe we should add __attribute__((unused)) ?? > >> make[3]: *** No rule to make target '../support/nfs/libnfs.a', needed by 'statdb_dump'. >> make[3]: Target 'statdb_dump' not remade because of errors. >> make[2]: *** [Makefile:1028: check-am] Error 2 >> make[1]: *** [Makefile:717: check-recursive] Error 1 >> make[1]: Target 'check' not remade because of errors. >> > > I assume you get these errors by running "make check" without first > running "make"?? > If you run "make" first, the errors go away, and you are left with the > warnings. > > Maybe they are worth fixing .... let's see what Jeff thinks. > > NeilBrown >