Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37674 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752550AbeADUh6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jan 2018 15:37:58 -0500 Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: nfs-utils-2.3.1 released. To: Jeff Layton , NeilBrown , Andreas Radke Cc: Linux NFS Mailing list References: <1a56bb72-cc10-ba74-2b04-4df588804ef5@RedHat.com> <20171221212516.031618d8@laptop64.home> <87a7xudx8o.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <1515074361.20282.23.camel@kernel.org> From: Steve Dickson Message-ID: <63e4e0d5-55ed-3ac2-2508-be12534947f4@RedHat.com> Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 15:37:57 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1515074361.20282.23.camel@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/04/2018 08:59 AM, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 16:11 +1100, NeilBrown wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 21 2017, Andreas Radke wrote: >> >>> This new version fails make check here now: >>> >>> nsm_client.c:147:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] >>> my_prog = atoi(optarg); >>> ~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>> nsm_client.c:148:3: note: here >>> case 'v': >>> ^~~~ >> >> What do you think Jeff, you introduced this code 8 years ago and this >> switch statement has always been broken. > > Ouch! We don't hold it against you.. 8-) > >> Does anyone use this code? Should we fix it, it just remove it? >> >> >> >>> make[4]: *** No rule to make target '../../support/nfs/libnfs.a', >>> needed by 'nsm_client'. >> >> This looks like a bug in automake??? ../../support/nfs/libnfs.a is >> listed as _LDADD >> >> https://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Program-and-Library-Variables.html#index-maude_005fAR >> >> which should add it to the 'ld' command, but I don't see that it should >> be added as a dependency. >> >>> make[4]: Target 'nsm_client' not remade because of errors. >>> make[3]: *** [Makefile:565: check-am] Error 2 >>> make[2]: *** [Makefile:567: check] Error 2 >>> statdb_dump.c: In function ‘dump_host’: >>> statdb_dump.c:38:17: warning: unused parameter ‘timestamp’ [-Wunused-parameter] >>> const time_t timestamp) >>> ^~~~~~~~~ >> >> This arg has to be there because it is part of an external API. >> As the function is passed as an arg to an extern function, gcc could >> deduce that the signature cannot be changed just because the arg isn't >> needed. >> >> >>> statdb_dump.c: In function ‘main’: >>> statdb_dump.c:91:10: warning: unused parameter ‘argc’ [-Wunused-parameter] >>> main(int argc, char **argv) >>> ^~~~ >> >> This arg doesn't need to be used (obviously) but cannot be removed. >> So this is a dumb warning too. >> >> Maybe we should add __attribute__((unused)) ?? >> >>> make[3]: *** No rule to make target '../support/nfs/libnfs.a', needed by 'statdb_dump'. >>> make[3]: Target 'statdb_dump' not remade because of errors. >>> make[2]: *** [Makefile:1028: check-am] Error 2 >>> make[1]: *** [Makefile:717: check-recursive] Error 1 >>> make[1]: Target 'check' not remade because of errors. >>> >> >> I assume you get these errors by running "make check" without first >> running "make"?? >> If you run "make" first, the errors go away, and you are left with the >> warnings. >> >> Maybe they are worth fixing .... let's see what Jeff thinks. >> >> NeilBrown > > I don't have any particular attachment to this code these days. statd is > legacy code at this point. I'm fine with removing it. > > If we do intend to keep it though, then we should definitely fix that > switch statement. I really think the question is if this is dead code... lets to the appropriate thing... with all due respect... of course! :-) steved. > > Thanks, >