Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f50.google.com ([209.85.214.50]:37552 "EHLO mail-it0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965156AbeALVa0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jan 2018 16:30:26 -0500 Received: by mail-it0-f50.google.com with SMTP id d137so10867270itc.2 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 13:30:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20180110004920.11100-1-gjover@sipwise.com> <49E44F63-42CF-4BF8-91E0-F89945D7CFE6@oracle.com> <20180112180528.GA9479@thunder.hadrons.org> <20180112211219.GA17573@suse.de> From: Matt Benjamin Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 16:30:24 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Libtirpc-devel] [PATCH] Do not bind to reserved ports registered in /etc/services To: Chuck Lever Cc: Thorsten Kukuk , Guillem Jover , Linux NFS Mailing List , libtirpc List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Chuck, On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 4:14 PM, Chuck Lever wrote: >> >> openSUSE is removing sunrpc from glibc, Fedora seems to be removing >> sunrpc from glibc, so it's only a matter of time when libtirpc is the >> only RPC implementation used on Linux. > > There are other RPC implementations, for example: > > - The nonstandard TI-RPC library used internally by Ganesha > The current idea behind libntirpc is that it has no intent, and provides no trivial ability, to serve as the ONC RPC implementation for any Linux application services. It is, in other words, a 3rd-party component from the Linux system point of view. Matt > - The RPC librar(ies) buried in Kerberos implementations > > So there's more to do than simply removing the one in glibc, > unfortunately. > > > -- > Chuck Lever -- Matt Benjamin Red Hat, Inc. 315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103 http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage tel. 734-821-5101 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309