Return-Path: Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:56924 "EHLO userp2130.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755734AbeASQTZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jan 2018 11:19:25 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/12] rdma/ib: Add trace point macros to display human-readable values From: Chuck Lever In-Reply-To: <20180118223446.GB17294@ziepe.ca> Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 11:19:20 -0500 Cc: Anna Schumaker , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Linux NFS Mailing List Message-Id: <73857AF2-BE14-451B-AC9D-1F2B2395CCB7@oracle.com> References: <20171220210236.29321.59307.stgit@manet.1015granger.net> <20171220213023.29321.97527.stgit@manet.1015granger.net> <1245d090-99ee-c517-5f8f-afdb7ffc0456@Netapp.com> <20180118223446.GB17294@ziepe.ca> To: Jason Gunthorpe Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > On Jan 18, 2018, at 5:34 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >=20 > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 04:49:20PM -0500, Anna Schumaker wrote: >> Hi Folks, >>=20 >> On 12/20/2017 04:30 PM, Chuck Lever wrote: >>> These can be shared with all kernel ULPs, and more can easily be >>> added as needed. >>>=20 >>> Note: checkpatch.pl has some heartburn with the TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM >>> macros and the LIST macros. These follow the same style as other >>> header files under include/tracing/events , thus should be >>> considered acceptable exceptions. >>>=20 >>> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever >>> include/trace/events/rdma.h | 128 = +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 include/trace/events/rdma.h >>=20 >> Just checking that it's okay to send this through the NFS tree, >> since it goes along with the rest of Chuck's patches? >=20 > New file, won't create any conflicts, so should be fine. >=20 > Is this API or anything that needs a really special look? >=20 >>> +++ b/include/trace/events/rdma.h >>> @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ >>> +/* >>> + * Copyright (c) 2017 Oracle. All rights reserved. >>> + */ >=20 > This should have a SPDX header though, from what I understand. If Anna adds SPDX headers to the files introduced in this series, can we get an Acked-by for this patch from one of the RDMA maintainers? Or is that not necessary? -- Chuck Lever