Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f48.google.com ([209.85.214.48]:56081 "EHLO mail-it0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751741AbeA3Uxh (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:53:37 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180130203221.29310-1-jlayton@kernel.org> References: <20180130173126.2806-1-jlayton@kernel.org> <20180130203221.29310-1-jlayton@kernel.org> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 12:53:35 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iversion: make inode_cmp_iversion{+raw} return bool instead of s64 To: Jeff Layton Cc: linux-fsdevel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Al Viro , Linux NFS Mailing List , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" , linux-xfs , linux-btrfs , linux-integrity , Trond Myklebust Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Ack. Should I expect this in a future pull request, or take it directly? There's no hurry about this, since none of the existing users of that function actually do anything but test the return value against zero, and nobody saves it into anything but a "bool" (which has magical casting properties and does not lose upper bits). Linus