Return-Path: Received: from smtp-o-1.desy.de ([131.169.56.154]:54037 "EHLO smtp-o-1.desy.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752129AbeBUKqf (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Feb 2018 05:46:35 -0500 Received: from smtp-map-1.desy.de (smtp-map-1.desy.de [131.169.56.66]) by smtp-o-1.desy.de (DESY-O-1) with ESMTP id 9026D280702 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:46:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from z-mbx-2.desy.de (z-mbx-2.desy.de [131.169.55.140]) by smtp-intra-1.desy.de (DESY-INTRA-1) with ESMTP id C6A233E903 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:46:32 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:46:32 +0100 (CET) From: "Mkrtchyan, Tigran" To: linux-nfs Message-ID: <1894283666.7881272.1519209992729.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de> Subject: question on kernel stack trace MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On one of our nodes we got the following stack trace: Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: updatedb D 000000000000000f 0 32087 32081 0x00000080 Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: ffff880852d13a88 0000000000000082 0000000000000000 ffffffffa00bfe13 Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: 0000000000000050 0000000300000001 000d5a7576495a7a 0000000000000286 Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: 0000000000000286 00000001dfd51213 ffff8810207c5068 ffff880852d13fd8 Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: Call Trace: Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] ? ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x83/0x1d0 [ext4] Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] ? __rpc_sleep_on_priority+0xf4/0x330 [sunrpc] Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] ? rpc_wait_bit_killable+0x0/0xa0 [sunrpc] Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] rpc_wait_bit_killable+0x42/0xa0 [sunrpc] Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] __wait_on_bit+0x5f/0x90 Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] ? xprt_reserve_xprt+0x87/0x110 [sunrpc] Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] ? rpc_wait_bit_killable+0x0/0xa0 [sunrpc] Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x78/0x90 Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] ? wake_bit_function+0x0/0x50 Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] __rpc_execute+0xf5/0x350 [sunrpc] Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] ? bit_waitqueue+0x17/0xd0 Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] rpc_execute+0x61/0xa0 [sunrpc] Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] rpc_run_task+0x75/0x90 [sunrpc] Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] rpc_call_sync+0x42/0x70 [sunrpc] Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] _nfs4_call_sync+0x3e/0x40 [nfs] Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] _nfs4_proc_getattr+0xac/0xc0 [nfs] Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] nfs4_proc_getattr+0x56/0x80 [nfs] Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] __nfs_revalidate_inode+0xe3/0x220 [nfs] Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] nfs_getattr+0xde/0x210 [nfs] Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] vfs_getattr+0x51/0x80 Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] ? cp_new_stat+0xe4/0x100 Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] vfs_fstatat+0x64/0xa0 Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] vfs_lstat+0x1e/0x20 Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] sys_newlstat+0x24/0x50 Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] ? system_call_after_swapgs+0x187/0x220 Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] ? system_call_after_swapgs+0x180/0x220 Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x1d7/0x200 Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] ? system_call_after_swapgs+0x16b/0x220 Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] ? system_call_after_swapgs+0x164/0x220 Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] ? system_call_after_swapgs+0x15d/0x220 Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] ? system_call_after_swapgs+0x156/0x220 Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] ? system_call_after_swapgs+0x14f/0x220 Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [] ? system_call_after_swapgs+0xca/0x220 I am surprised, that top of the stack trace is in ext4 module. Can some one put a light on it? Thanks in advance, Tigran.