Return-Path: Received: from smtp-fw-33001.amazon.com ([207.171.190.10]:34211 "EHLO smtp-fw-33001.amazon.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752078AbeEJVPu (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2018 17:15:50 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 21:15:46 +0000 From: Vallish Vaidyeshwara To: "bfields@fieldses.org" CC: Trond Myklebust , "anna.schumaker@netapp.com" , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" , "jlayton@kernel.org" , "jsstraus@amazon.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] SUNRPC: Reconnect with new port on server initiated connection termination Message-ID: <20180510211546.GB50901@amazon.com> References: <1525932774-98736-1-git-send-email-vallish@amazon.com> <1525932774-98736-3-git-send-email-vallish@amazon.com> <20180510162202.GA24317@amazon.com> <20180510173728.GA3736@fieldses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <20180510173728.GA3736@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 01:37:28PM -0400, bfields@fieldses.org wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 04:22:02PM +0000, Vallish Vaidyeshwara wrote: > > If the server has closed a connection, then no DRC state remains on the server > > we want to use. > > That's not a rule, as far as I know. Certainly the Linux server doesn't > destroy DRC state on closing a connection. (Should it? I'm not sure > that's a good idea.) > > --b. > Thanks for the clarification and I agree patch 2 should not be applied.