Return-Path: Received: from discipline.rit.edu ([129.21.6.207]:62129 "HELO discipline.rit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751198AbeENLbx (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2018 07:31:53 -0400 From: Andrew W Elble To: "J. Bruce Fields" Cc: , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nfsd: fix error handling in nfs4_set_delegation() References: <20180509120249.62022-1-aweits@rit.edu> <20180511213005.GF3765@fieldses.org> Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 07:31:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20180511213005.GF3765@fieldses.org> (J. Bruce Fields's message of "Fri, 11 May 2018 17:30:05 -0400") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: >> + /* >> + * This delegation is doomed, tell the recall logic >> + * that it's being destroyed here. >> + */ >> + >> + if (status) { >> + dp->dl_time++; >> + list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru); >> + dp->dl_stid.sc_type = NFS4_CLOSED_DELEG_STID; >> + } > > I'm trying to figure out if this fixes an actual bug. The code should > be able to deal with a callback on an already unhashed delegation, so I > think you're right it would at worst just be an unnecessary recall. But an 'normal' unhashed delegation would have a persistent refcount, this one would not. If the recall code gets a hold of it, it will place it on nn->del_recall_lru, and then free it in nfsd4_cb_recall_release()? > This won't catch every such case (could be that nfsd4_cb_recall_prepare > already ran and we're too late), so I wonder if this is worth it. > > More interesting to me is what exactly it would take to hit this > case.... Another thread would have to have succesfully hashed a > delegation for this client and file to make our hash_delegation_locked > fail. So there would be two leases for the same file and client, but > with different delegation pointers as the fl_owner. I *think* we handle > that OK. But it was likely problematic previously when we were still > using the file pointer as the fl_owner. I'm thinking this is more easily hit via fp->fi_had_conflict, if a lease break comes in at the right time? Thanks, Andy -- Andrew W. Elble aweits@discipline.rit.edu Infrastructure Engineer, Communications Technical Lead Rochester Institute of Technology PGP: BFAD 8461 4CCF DC95 DA2C B0EB 965B 082E 863E C912