Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:32927 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750777AbeEaVxo (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 May 2018 17:53:44 -0400 Subject: Re: nfs4_acl restricts copy_up in overlayfs To: Miklos Szeredi , Trond Myklebust Cc: "bfields@fieldses.org" , "agruenba@redhat.com" , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org" References: <2cf94c6b-e819-79af-4ac9-3b19d26dc6d9@suse.de> <75266c983a03f6dbfd5d1a39c94fa6d56a1a8a22.camel@hammerspace.com> <20180531004554.GA29116@fieldses.org> <128c74cb1507d7eab36ac8d32182dbbc7d3f9f88.camel@hammerspace.com> From: Goldwyn Rodrigues Message-ID: Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 16:53:38 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/31/2018 08:30 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 3:10 PM, Trond Myklebust > wrote: >>> >>> I understand. Ignoring nfs4_acl in overlayfs will have the same >>> result as adding noacl to the underlying NFS mount. Adding noacl in NFS client mount has no affect to nfs4_acl. Only if you add noacl in the underlying filesystem of exported directory in the server does the nfs4_acl go away. -- Goldwyn