Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D290ECDE4B for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 15:31:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED8420825 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 15:31:37 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DED8420825 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=fieldses.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726781AbeKIBHi (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Nov 2018 20:07:38 -0500 Received: from fieldses.org ([173.255.197.46]:38568 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726774AbeKIBHh (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Nov 2018 20:07:37 -0500 Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id 9618C207B; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 10:31:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 10:31:36 -0500 From: "J. Bruce Fields" To: Ben Greear Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Support for VRF in NFS? Message-ID: <20181108153136.GA4947@fieldses.org> References: <20181108011429.GC30776@fieldses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 09:08:16PM -0800, Ben Greear wrote: > > > On 11/07/2018 05:14 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > >On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 01:03:54PM -0800, Ben Greear wrote: > >>Hello, > >> > >>I made a stab at implementing VRF support in NFS, but it appears > >>fairly complicated and I ended up reverting my changes.... > >> > >>Is anyone working on this? > >> > >>And, if not, if anyone would like to be sponsored to work on this, please > >>let me know. > > > >Um, sorry--what's VRF? > > Virtual Router logic. It is sort of like network stack containers, > and has been solid and fully featured in the kernel since 4.16 or so. > > In the end, you effectively need to call the logic that SO_BINDTODEVICE > calls on the socket before binding to an IP. > > The NFS and RPC logic is a giant tangled mess to my eyes, so > hoping I could bribe someone else to do it :) So it's not enough to support network namespaces? What's your motivation for this? --b.