Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 746ECC64EB1 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 14:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4539A20989 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 14:51:58 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4539A20989 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=mba.ocn.ne.jp Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726129AbeLGOvw (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2018 09:51:52 -0500 Received: from mfdf022.ocn.ad.jp ([153.128.50.80]:53104 "EHLO mfdf022.ocn.ad.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725998AbeLGOvv (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2018 09:51:51 -0500 Received: from mogw0939.ocn.ad.jp (mogw0939.ocn.ad.jp [153.149.227.45]) by mfdf022.ocn.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19CD522353E; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 23:51:50 +0900 (JST) Received: from mf-smf-unw009c1 (mf-smf-unw009c1.ocn.ad.jp [153.138.219.105]) by mogw0939.ocn.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3794AD00506; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 23:51:48 +0900 (JST) Received: from ocn-vc-mts-201c1.ocn.ad.jp ([153.138.219.212]) by mf-smf-unw009c1 with ESMTP id VHRhgngCrHkOOVHTogbxLT; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 23:51:48 +0900 Received: from smtp.ocn.ne.jp ([153.149.227.165]) by ocn-vc-mts-201c1.ocn.ad.jp with ESMTP id VHTngelAL63EtVHTngM9yz; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 23:51:48 +0900 Received: from localhost (p935071-ipngn2102funabasi.chiba.ocn.ne.jp [180.56.175.71]) by smtp.ocn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 23:51:47 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2018 23:51:41 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20181207.235141.2138062629640003368.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> To: geert@linux-m68k.org Cc: trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: NFS/TCP crashes on MIPS/RBTX4927 in v4.20-rcX (bisected) From: Atsushi Nemoto In-Reply-To: References: <20181205.221146.969453990167463340.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> X-Fingerprint: 6ACA 1623 39BD 9A94 9B1A B746 CA77 FE94 2874 D52F X-Pgp-Public-Key: http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2874D52F X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 14:41:30 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > When using these options, I do see a slowdown in early boot, but the issue > is still there. Hmm, the NIC of the board is NE2000 variants, so DMA coherency will not be an issue anyway. So strange ... The board has a PCI slot. If you had an legacy PCI NIC card, trying with it might help finding the bug. > My next guess is an unaligned access not using {get,put}_unaligned(), which > doesn't seem to work on tx4927, but doesn't cause an exception neither. IIRC, TX49 can raise an exception on unaligned access. --- Atsushi Nemoto