Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DBE2C43387 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 17:56:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB9820874 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 17:56:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1545069409; bh=HawIpgmdC2avxp5D8Lhdnsk7PnER3qJFKPS8eU+8eh8=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=aeuUlVWVZXMHo81ALSimXLowgBMmJNV+MeTuYjo1rqKZmwuLLkWRXPO+kwL+J4/ia QMjxrz0pB4qAUgqdyNqLicep/RcN7bDzGrjkVIt8eih6jifFT9WPx6Kofj9hJfZxJs ivp0FonRAdwMgJNAehSY6qw+/j62eVcP8GzYbWg8= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727200AbeLQR4s (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Dec 2018 12:56:48 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59694 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726801AbeLQR4s (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Dec 2018 12:56:48 -0500 Received: from tleilax.poochiereds.net (cpe-71-70-156-158.nc.res.rr.com [71.70.156.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CD4F2086C; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 17:56:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1545069407; bh=HawIpgmdC2avxp5D8Lhdnsk7PnER3qJFKPS8eU+8eh8=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=BAOtPqSRZ/tkq+Kmtx+Fj8qytoNGvykpovy4lSmuJZqCdGrp4Hu2tL2bWago8gRVR WqH5qhgSlS3+BsjgcEvPgqyIy9jMA0j6c/n4l27fAGHjXV22xfP6qLTBIZgMXIBl6v 4b2JyTypJFwSMelkFLTgd2LM/as+YY2EQMaIrD7U= Message-ID: <285400e54a70548b4404ecdba9e44c4e8e6c5953.camel@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] nfs: fix debug message in svc_create_xprt() From: Jeff Layton To: Vasily Averin , "J. Bruce Fields" , Trond Myklebust , Anna Schumaker Cc: Chuck Lever , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Evgenii Shatokhin , Konstantin Khorenko Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 12:56:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.3 (3.30.3-1.fc29) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2018-12-17 at 19:26 +0300, Vasily Averin wrote: > _svc_create_xprt() returns positive port number > so its non-zero return value is not an error > > Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin > --- > net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c > index 51d36230b6e3..130af22d5c66 100644 > --- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c > +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c > @@ -296,9 +296,9 @@ int svc_create_xprt(struct svc_serv *serv, const char *xprt_name, > request_module("svc%s", xprt_name); > err = _svc_create_xprt(serv, xprt_name, net, family, port, flags); > } > - if (err) > + if (err < 0) > dprintk("svc: transport %s not found, err %d\n", > - xprt_name, err); > + xprt_name, -err); > return err; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(svc_create_xprt); This patch is fine, but _svc_create_xprt does not make it clear that it returns a positive port number. Would you be amenable to spinning up a patch to add a kerneldoc comment over that function (and maybe one over svc_create_xprt too), to make it clear what it does? Thanks, Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton