Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15235C169C4 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 12:01:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D859E218DA for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 12:01:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726600AbfBHMBP (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2019 07:01:15 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40754 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726568AbfBHMBP (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2019 07:01:15 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2127C079907; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 12:01:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.176.1] (ovpn-112-2.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.112.2]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55F8760123; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 12:01:13 +0000 (UTC) From: "Benjamin Coddington" To: "Jason Tibbitts" Cc: "Trond Myklebust" , Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Chuck.Lever@oracle.com Subject: Re: Need help debugging NFS issues new to 4.20 kernel Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2019 07:01:11 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87d0o3aadg.fsf@hippogriff.math.uh.edu> References: <87ftt2cdeq.fsf@hippogriff.math.uh.edu> <87imxwab12.fsf@hippogriff.math.uh.edu> <662CE7B3-235E-4E2D-9C8C-0F6233F3085F@redhat.com> <87d0o3aadg.fsf@hippogriff.math.uh.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Fri, 08 Feb 2019 12:01:15 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On 7 Feb 2019, at 10:25, Jason Tibbitts wrote: >>>>>> "BC" == Benjamin Coddington writes: > > BC> -10063 is -NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED.. I wonder why the > BC> trace_nfs4_sequence_done() in nfs41_sequence_process() isn't showing > BC> up in the trace? Ah.. my fault - add "nfs4:*" to the set_events. > > OK, attached is another trace. Here's the same sequence I snipped > previously: So the client is calling SEQ over and over.. xs_stream_read_data sees -EAGAIN.. I'm not an expert here, and not seeing what's going wrong. Hmm.. commit c443305529d1d3d3bee0d68fdd14ae89835e091f changed xs_read_stream_reply() to return recv.copied instead of "ret" to xprt_complete_rqst().. You could try reverting that commit and see if the problem goes away.. Ben