Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA32CC10F00 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:37:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933CE21773 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:37:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728743AbfBTAhC (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2019 19:37:02 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:59694 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726986AbfBTAhB (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2019 19:37:01 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x1K0Ntju090819 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 19:37:01 -0500 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2qrqrj340p-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 19:37:00 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:36:58 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:36:55 -0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x1K0asqJ26411030 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:36:54 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6135CA405C; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:36:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74443A4060; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:36:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.80.107.132]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:36:53 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] IMA on NFS prototype From: Mimi Zohar To: Chuck Lever , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 19:36:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20190214203336.6469.34750.stgit@manet.1015granger.net> References: <20190214203336.6469.34750.stgit@manet.1015granger.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19022000-4275-0000-0000-0000031185ED X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19022000-4276-0000-0000-0000381FB39E Message-Id: <1550623002.17768.10.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-02-20_01:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=932 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1902200001 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Hi Chuck, > EVM is not supported in this prototype. NFS does not support several > of the xattrs that are protected by EVM: SMACK64, Posix ACLs, and > Linux file capabilities are not supported, which makes EVM more > difficult to support on NFS mounts. There's no requirement for all of these xattrs to exist.  If an xattr does exist, then it is included in the security.evm hmac/signature. Mimi