Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE71EC43381 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 15:03:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE9820850 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 15:03:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.com header.i=@yahoo.com header.b="WkttnIsj" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726857AbfCSPDF (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:03:05 -0400 Received: from sonic310-30.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([66.163.186.211]:42362 "EHLO sonic310-30.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726876AbfCSPDE (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:03:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1553007783; bh=8eLDNP09NKHtb6NKCYkbHfriJ1YDJnmcG+IWUIIPBv8=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=WkttnIsjw2rQEQWwCEPKQJhxjki53j4LZYFvJW2pQ0+ptuInKOzNW5F1+L4I6etBeV1ocq3JA2bLk/TPV+LvXnTssXOd4ATRhjmsqRXOhX02LhUvuucQtlwo3KzO5uIaQYTFK4uwepi5cjgb22TKLX5NSFSYYPZCSp5XOxn2XVosXpRxItLSFy1A/dSTjZHgHoF5vmIHNwlExPKV8TeS49/6tVy4ddAXCTVfqOoIt7s5aMPpI6jFnkU5ZnwIRHWmg1HIXBknNvBZYifyzFASdLHmY+rBjsMZ2FJVrPWs2WTQLKPrhsGNZYiuZH/TKtP7tBTXlF2Dp/5d7Dv165FJdA== X-YMail-OSG: lfg7TroVM1mnAKETjHG4PAgpnkk.fgSnZhWVqK1FkMlzaTOG4BpRN.sIHkA3Mb_ 1_NzOUE3bvJmHUmDtkYZ.kVgv9wUmw94pP27QT0RJ4d1G7KfaEDImSPkRS8crhRUHJaUanbaA2aQ fVIyMViTojLp7socja5glXFbHaX_mHqVhlCZ8l0GKoWoz3iF9_RkVtmlL.U2RLrm_bcwdSF7Nix1 cwFXvVRIAS39JWVeUOBoEzfpFNVhEU8W_HDapcMba2TzcP9_jQXwNS2DmvCDtGYhK6nj6cLX6PDl pB7aAiblCTMA8JqBDZnxoN4oSkcRqMZfL2qT0w4gr7mI60ARKmHfvgk.ogaq7Zk_x5fztUirnzCs Lv14t554TB8BgcA7W73O65sUo.nLCS9tjAhmLRluW32sbv.uaeXb8vj8gyktKQ9BR6e.1gbo2eqa B00yj1jTIOtq349fhicZLqHAN5br7277bTjjhT6HHiHe_o5gdZpO1y6RcWvEwezKaySys3liKuI5 LruFRpQNN8WgFpD0bJCtecuBAWEjJ2QRABa7FfDUXEBmV6I6DS9TLhPkZdKecKh7Ps2agf2LhxB2 S1NuI5nkUUcPWVC6dZg8l2llL2IoiBt4waqAlCxCiaEzUt6GtpSxWiuAfv9683xdbF9vrL.m.xOX UGlYa7ydVf2nG1d9EzZGkLTqYb.8IMUDr4V59Ofx5DdE4qtwRJndLDD.DMG5fc8sOICqDxdnVBsd f9iIK8ZT4UCoVfMABKoJyBJ5CqRFBOtSJgIlb9MK3NllLrAFMXnWEplCu.DzdL5ewSMzJUxkrIkl WPuxo6ZLWFqlXeFZo8glPwcNWwzfqP0h7H6dD_j2gwp5qm9tQPDEsrlsQUzKQ_ylDFJjDAzP0Zgf rx7VM79tE9hfAdGpyeq2m.HFZIOFyDyGSHnf_3C8fKgyQ5fJGm5yNb0UgND5rsCaZLUp8VS1wJRo cVw5gDLGB8dKIWHwKz4zaDG3zbhcoJNZyIuqjUgwBSV_QWVSsbCjoLoZkkxkKVPDvh.tDzmREdWk kuz5Beia72UxmgoHwEU5T2bPUDuFz0YeFf47E.JdcU8NO1tP2MeXNAr_NuxVoHTNWzsHbaMMBE1W p2PC7FyxL.9xOIhm57fGSsWf5wTgIX19G1na.dcul Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic310.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 15:03:03 +0000 Received: from c-67-169-65-224.hsd1.ca.comcast.net (EHLO [192.168.0.103]) ([67.169.65.224]) by smtp417.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 2f9b5d50a452cf0c127cb7cfad7d058a; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 15:03:01 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: mount.nfs: Protocol error after upgrade to linux/master To: Tetsuo Handa , Kees Cook Cc: Jakub Kicinski , linux-security-module , Trond Myklebust , "open list:NFS, SUNRPC, AND..." , Anna Schumaker , LKML References: <20190315110555.0807d015@cakuba.netronome.com> <20190315120105.5541ad46@cakuba.netronome.com> <20190315165440.53b9db3c@cakuba.netronome.com> <2bf23acd-22c4-a260-7648-845887a409d5@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> From: Casey Schaufler Message-ID: Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 08:03:01 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2bf23acd-22c4-a260-7648-845887a409d5@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On 3/19/2019 3:56 AM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Since Kees Cook seems to be busy now, here is my version... > > From 885553e4793d9af2d4e9e99c7d137b0ec7b5f8ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Tetsuo Handa > Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 19:52:31 +0900 > Subject: [PATCH] LSM: Revive CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY_* for "make oldconfig" > > Commit 70b62c25665f636c ("LoadPin: Initialize as ordered LSM") removed > CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY_{SELINUX,SMACK,TOMOYO,APPARMOR,DAC} from > security/Kconfig and changed CONFIG_LSM to provide a fixed ordering as a > default value. That commit expected that existing users (upgrading from > Linux 5.0 and earlier) will edit CONFIG_LSM value in accordance with > their CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY_* choice in their old kernel configs. But > since users might forget to edit CONFIG_LSM value, this patch revives > the choice (only for providing the default value for CONFIG_LSM) in order > to make sure that CONFIG_LSM reflects CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY_* from their > old kernel configs. > > Reported-by: Jakub Kicinski > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook > Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa Acked-by: Casey Schaufler > --- > security/Kconfig | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig > index 1d6463f..743e594 100644 > --- a/security/Kconfig > +++ b/security/Kconfig > @@ -239,9 +239,43 @@ source "security/safesetid/Kconfig" > > source "security/integrity/Kconfig" > > +choice > + prompt "Default security module [superseded by 'Ordered list of enabled LSMs' below]" > + default DEFAULT_SECURITY_SELINUX if SECURITY_SELINUX > + default DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK if SECURITY_SMACK > + default DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO if SECURITY_TOMOYO > + default DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR if SECURITY_APPARMOR > + default DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC > + > + help > + This choice is there only for converting CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY in old > + kernel config to CONFIG_LSM in new kernel config. Don't change this choice > + unless you are creating a fresh kernel config, for this choice will be > + ignored after CONFIG_LSM is once defined. > + > + config DEFAULT_SECURITY_SELINUX > + bool "SELinux" if SECURITY_SELINUX=y > + > + config DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK > + bool "Simplified Mandatory Access Control" if SECURITY_SMACK=y > + > + config DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO > + bool "TOMOYO" if SECURITY_TOMOYO=y > + > + config DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR > + bool "AppArmor" if SECURITY_APPARMOR=y > + config DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC > + bool "Unix Discretionary Access Controls" > + > +endchoice > + > config LSM > string "Ordered list of enabled LSMs" > - default "yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,selinux,smack,tomoyo,apparmor" > + default "yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,selinux" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_SELINUX > + default "yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,smack" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK > + default "yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,tomoyo" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO > + default "yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,apparmor" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR > + default "yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity" > help > A comma-separated list of LSMs, in initialization order. > Any LSMs left off this list will be ignored. This can be