Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B9EC43381 for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 14:09:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C443C2070D for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 14:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umich.edu header.i=@umich.edu header.b="pR2pXrkt" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726595AbfCTOJA (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Mar 2019 10:09:00 -0400 Received: from mail-vs1-f41.google.com ([209.85.217.41]:36611 "EHLO mail-vs1-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726067AbfCTOJA (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Mar 2019 10:09:00 -0400 Received: by mail-vs1-f41.google.com with SMTP id n4so1562136vsm.3 for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 07:08:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umich.edu; s=google-2016-06-03; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MzD/mXnE0GQXKG3l4IO09duDzjKGkOX12Xq8YvLr8pg=; b=pR2pXrktpovJL/b2hWmMdiZWq7CW5g1ErQGfFbmegOIYKWh2o70rwbXwBtU1vnfhlv 20q6RHo1QWIeU3Cb9FtJaCmz+/bOU6HQiev7G3Z2FWUi/HBZCiB1Iy3rs0KF3mQl8mMb ROUiZb30agVfh/X8zWDLWMPBEqEvxSbebBJSS+/Zf+VosbEK45zY8nQoLzUZjbZhkCQt RYCU4rVMMYEs9UMZ8CMLQEKG5JBn1EJt3/ZD9+/hE8Y0WANverdJlwcakJWMheNhHui8 Eo0mWGEEkqAhE560fsNz0Wl4C5xnMzts7ZkpEI40/hbZ0u5MBr/LjZEfBXtOuNXCdUYF ZcsQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MzD/mXnE0GQXKG3l4IO09duDzjKGkOX12Xq8YvLr8pg=; b=DgzGQKOuAUGBPldvV+R43zn6ZcHgknIVpWK92zbgu6L1tp7ofRJEfqRjQf+RwZsjKH Rqz1GGgXYtvrB6EH8V2L1t1mMZGZeF800ro+U2Q5WJ5sh0RKl5iog/E/rJze2DbhtQmJ i4kRXpBYwZAdS1IZZ1DJ7sqPE7B30AVAkALsqzxjF3k7bckoHbkd4a/AXC12fdRgyXp+ Hxy6P1hP1UOAQuUYQLVtHcjTw0t6EcPexCJ6ket0YGWB41ZZ3uSCxF9fx9fV3WpHvrMo d5aRNwnB3ChOaoIhq7bw9wdTATLee6aOxrrisYiXSDRYo4SnK3nDgOBxPpeg8QscAUVy mNmw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU702VVJJ2Q8uMogzGabs2O3OF3aQcQ5HoE/gQNYqiYptid1gK8 C0askBg9roa0d24v7RkZpunaVhCMidaLxnBitDYwx/0q X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzvepyClKWxV6lxF87qw9sBZIg/s1pm/SOKMMeyDJuIi+G4OEOkqfWB87t1AGE5wa6MCJEfhKP9hdom3o3sQeA= X-Received: by 2002:a67:8210:: with SMTP id e16mr4801359vsd.85.1553090939014; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 07:08:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Olga Kornievskaia Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 10:08:47 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cannot check if nfsv4 is running or not by rpcinfo To: Naruto Nguyen Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org This is a specific question related to that deployment. rpcinfo -T tcp 172.17.5.13 100003 4 works for a typical linux client/server. I suggest you contact Redhat to answer this specific question. On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11:53 AM Naruto Nguyen wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > As the information from this link > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openstack_platform/13/html-single/storage_guide/#mount-shares-instance, > I see that we have to query if Manila nfsv4 is running or not by: > > rpcinfo -T tcp -a 172.17.5.13.8.1 100003 4 > > I cannot use > > rpcinfo -T tcp 172.17.5.13 100003 4 > > It will be stuck and other command like " rpcinfo -T tcp -n 2049 > 172.17.5.13 nfs 4 leads to "rpcinfo: RPC: Port mapper failure - Timed > out" but these commands are successful with nfsv3 and even on some > other nfsv4, not Manila nfsv4. > > Could you please let me know why I cannot use other commands, but have > to specify "8.1" (2049) in server address? Does it depend on nfs4 > server implementation or if we have any specification standard to > query nfsv4 running? > > Thanks a lot > Best regards, > Naruto