Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5DBC10F13 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 19:35:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 729A6206BA for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 19:35:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727136AbfDPTft (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:35:49 -0400 Received: from fieldses.org ([173.255.197.46]:39496 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726860AbfDPTfs (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:35:48 -0400 Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id 578511E19; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:35:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:35:48 -0400 To: Olga Kornievskaia Cc: linux-nfs Subject: Re: discuss NFS xfstest failures Message-ID: <20190416193548.GA6662@fieldses.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) From: bfields@fieldses.org (J. Bruce Fields) Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 01:01:39PM -0400, Olga Kornievskaia wrote: > Hi folks, > > We have some output at the wiki -- > https://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/Xfstests -- capturing a data > point of failures (for 4.16 kernel). However, I see many more failures > with the current (5.1-rc1). Wiki output should probably be updated > since xfstest has now 500+ tests. I have done my best to go over the > failures and provide some summary and comments. I'd like to see if the > community has any comments. Anybody else would like to share their > outputs from the xfstests that show other failures? For what it's worth, I keep a list in testd/data/xfstests-failed with some minimal comments: git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/testd.git Current contents appended. As you can see there's a lot that's known unsupported features, but also a lot that I just haven't looked into yet. --b. # http://people.redhat.com/bcodding/nfs/2016/10/07/nfs_xfstest_generic/ generic/035 generic/087 generic/294 generic/306 # We don't support all fallocate modes generic/031 generic/017 generic/062 generic/071 generic/422 generic/469 generic/499 # no fiemap generic/032 generic/094 generic/225 generic/425 # no xattrs generic/037 generic/337 generic/377 generic/403 generic/454 # NFSv4+ doesn't support system.posix_acl_access xattr: generic/053 generic/105 # xfstests used to skip this, not sure why it stopped: generic/064 # no support for fs freezing generic/068 generic/491 # needs root? generic/184 generic/434 # FIBMAP unsupported generic/519 # ---- need further triage: generic/033 generic/088 # intermittent ? generic/089 # intermittent ? generic/126 generic/277 generic/423 generic/426 generic/465 generic/478 # "record lock is not preserved across execve(2)" generic/484 # need a larger device? generic/485 generic/486