Received: by 2002:a25:86ce:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y14csp1123669ybm; Tue, 21 May 2019 09:00:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw2FdimGgLxsl/LLYAaGI/UvEdCAmO3dZKDg8CGYKAEfN2bl6Bg8NzJcbTCriaCaqVBMiqk X-Received: by 2002:a63:2c4a:: with SMTP id s71mr66181714pgs.343.1558454442104; Tue, 21 May 2019 09:00:42 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1558454442; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VUQGpDjfzFP4UKU0nbo49eQVchSfLnHRNUreonoeqMoYiZBXXVRMR+vFqlhxjtzpI9 7Yr/eSlD4/oai4Bx7wfRl0qxx5+OkfhaIx8dmbe684ja5sscAe7YwNvsibNNhtAZ62kz sVCM4CoOQffJVMZ2FLIbYXMhKk/CKrjGxQnME1NIBMTw4FX0p16r4HbfxBD3wMfIrW0D +0V/huOM/PDxefnCrkOcKDyjazxT7btx7lzs8xfTnBwpVms+QHp0ceaCC/Eoh0NKdHBi wOkTLtRWQozn2D71MpUGyzDgqbKLm5J6wtIPB+ZJVuXMaoOlddPgtoYBUOaXT3BrIQJ0 kvPA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=dpUAoQMElr0f1w26lxR+8xxX5RvHnPoxgHz6vvePTFQ=; b=bqTui1jvPrtyeUc2+V+9bSmyNLtV9z/LRUv1aPwzR9+ZMzkM7/KqZvVRS4Qo4HS7bW GcUtuwGHgSINimKk7bubUTb8AooPrFHs0VAqjFh1l1W8t32BobmqcltPpvdde+QBUAmu 0munJuqJSWQo9AXYAO5LuAaqSouq/8hNansPSRamcuqQAr6rSiHvonLvgW3ldAOWRLC2 A/gY292iy/i7A9Tn4pOmDSvuBEEa+FS73acTO23DMOr4Cfsb5okTV9HK8l4HatR4Axzf Dn1avx5HGjiOPg/12L/W556npTwTsCtX88kLaoq09V7jmYjnYO/0VivyNzDsfBOBbgqF 2z8w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j91si21386173pld.267.2019.05.21.09.00.20; Tue, 21 May 2019 09:00:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728053AbfEUP6W (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 21 May 2019 11:58:22 -0400 Received: from fieldses.org ([173.255.197.46]:57922 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727941AbfEUP6W (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 May 2019 11:58:22 -0400 Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id B4F011CEE; Tue, 21 May 2019 11:58:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 11:58:21 -0400 From: "J . Bruce Fields" To: Benjamin Coddington Cc: Xuewei Zhang , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "lockd: Show pid of lockd for remote locks" Message-ID: <20190521155821.GD9499@fieldses.org> References: <952928a350da64fd8de3e1a79deb8cc23552972f.1558362681.git.bcodding@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <952928a350da64fd8de3e1a79deb8cc23552972f.1558362681.git.bcodding@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:33:07AM -0400, Benjamin Coddington wrote: > This reverts most of commit b8eee0e90f97 ("lockd: Show pid of lockd for > remote locks"), which caused remote locks to not be differentiated between > remote processes for NLM. To make sure I understand: I assume a client resolves conflicts among its own processes before involving the server, so the server only needs to resolve conflicts among nlm_hosts. Is that right? So the only practical affect is the missing grant callbacks that Xuewei noticed? Or is my assumption not true in general? Or is it true only for some client implementations? --b. > > We retain the fixup for setting the client's fl_pid to a negative value. > > Fixes: b8eee0e90f97 ("lockd: Show pid of lockd for remote locks") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington > --- > fs/lockd/xdr.c | 4 ++-- > fs/lockd/xdr4.c | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/lockd/xdr.c b/fs/lockd/xdr.c > index 9846f7e95282..7147e4aebecc 100644 > --- a/fs/lockd/xdr.c > +++ b/fs/lockd/xdr.c > @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ nlm_decode_lock(__be32 *p, struct nlm_lock *lock) > > locks_init_lock(fl); > fl->fl_owner = current->files; > - fl->fl_pid = current->tgid; > + fl->fl_pid = (pid_t)lock->svid; > fl->fl_flags = FL_POSIX; > fl->fl_type = F_RDLCK; /* as good as anything else */ > start = ntohl(*p++); > @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ nlmsvc_decode_shareargs(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, __be32 *p) > memset(lock, 0, sizeof(*lock)); > locks_init_lock(&lock->fl); > lock->svid = ~(u32) 0; > - lock->fl.fl_pid = current->tgid; > + lock->fl.fl_pid = (pid_t)lock->svid; > > if (!(p = nlm_decode_cookie(p, &argp->cookie)) > || !(p = xdr_decode_string_inplace(p, &lock->caller, > diff --git a/fs/lockd/xdr4.c b/fs/lockd/xdr4.c > index 70154f376695..7ed9edf9aed4 100644 > --- a/fs/lockd/xdr4.c > +++ b/fs/lockd/xdr4.c > @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ nlm4_decode_lock(__be32 *p, struct nlm_lock *lock) > > locks_init_lock(fl); > fl->fl_owner = current->files; > - fl->fl_pid = current->tgid; > + fl->fl_pid = (pid_t)lock->svid; > fl->fl_flags = FL_POSIX; > fl->fl_type = F_RDLCK; /* as good as anything else */ > p = xdr_decode_hyper(p, &start); > @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ nlm4svc_decode_shareargs(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, __be32 *p) > memset(lock, 0, sizeof(*lock)); > locks_init_lock(&lock->fl); > lock->svid = ~(u32) 0; > - lock->fl.fl_pid = current->tgid; > + lock->fl.fl_pid = (pid_t)lock->svid; > > if (!(p = nlm4_decode_cookie(p, &argp->cookie)) > || !(p = xdr_decode_string_inplace(p, &lock->caller, > -- > 2.20.1