Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp5239954ybi; Tue, 28 May 2019 09:39:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzgVODH8cZxpRbdV18ooZtBx7+0isRRfxA3nSnG09GxoaYGvD3ANDf9w8c9+SHwq1IYzkg8 X-Received: by 2002:a63:ea44:: with SMTP id l4mr1617461pgk.29.1559061599797; Tue, 28 May 2019 09:39:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1559061599; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Jcn+HsVYEEJ3rOP4Q10ILLLOEClzemjPBr/KB9QS0hhkzQ7X7VnCHXCHV43Gkk/pCw kA4DaMficjUZUo9pzP8RTAw4rEY4laGks+s8KvGC7ERXJWE7X11pDWds2/Rn30+l5Rs3 7ajU3dd3waGKncg/rbs3f8mYUuah1/pYmO3/KpnnPrsGUEJ+IxF5a/ERpUx1EFJ/0jcg DmcKy72cGWGg0BB4GP6Y8hPXxhtnSRngO0lFlR2JolwOM8rRSA0gxIzu3KqucmHp9L5V jRO8PmsxdqUYN0l6bUqUcUdKuHLce1fesKEZgL2bP+PmHo9teq10rKTFAcA4m5IvF7Ge Segg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=kml4jUoEmHUUXVU1c7AViVp4FPM02sigk8d9DK0mLzY=; b=xYFWdoR1bzkssxPyvUeIfAZe9slKqgdBNfkEraPvn9yqrwRd79yL00+jNapSy9DjfJ UvRIZo4XXQUA24TdV5b5GD2aV06PxeKoQ+sxJwHGgl6G/oxCKRbQj20JlHxQgwVnM0Sy bC5qS1oxn7xmumLDIwcoA4SAe7HIx+q9gQ5w0AH2fwOAmbXHx1kYSfwGGJ3rmozEr3vm 4CHKSD+jCL0TGeEbhub2HaNLk0zluxLoWP94T05X2Iha4XlfHGcPHmbmFdagZJczbVRz Da2qRIUcfyaJPcaehc5sj03/8rLGp6xt6ei88QDvmCnL86QW24Zg/0+ZxT+NWHyfY3Q/ dXxw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=DM21Whm2; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l17si24024090pfd.202.2019.05.28.09.39.45; Tue, 28 May 2019 09:39:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=DM21Whm2; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726827AbfE1QjW (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 28 May 2019 12:39:22 -0400 Received: from mail-yw1-f65.google.com ([209.85.161.65]:38766 "EHLO mail-yw1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726600AbfE1QjW (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2019 12:39:22 -0400 Received: by mail-yw1-f65.google.com with SMTP id b74so8150721ywe.5; Tue, 28 May 2019 09:39:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kml4jUoEmHUUXVU1c7AViVp4FPM02sigk8d9DK0mLzY=; b=DM21Whm2L3cVgyx84wQDA/8HkSa3vmE2RxWxa5lp22AbmIh2SpsoPqlgSRhCAdo+1Y GSQKZy3B9olrPkd5nzl/C9vPni8uIlJ40X918/v46kgdqtCNBSS5pnQhRusLxSDgqgdJ Vz9xt9/xpSuhTF+1KPioCUJcj/3eYoaNwR1a1cbIkjekkhqdmefpIXUUoPY+Ua+XoSba b4hbU81lTdQWnjhTUPyvPW5yeErG2zuI2lQfUn3rk7x1j7m0bUuyJYyZcM2WSNX8cLnF fns0Q0rjh8OUnnU6Rf6M7mAenmCWWYHHwO53c40vof3mdC9ACND2uFlU+QjrPgY+9WAr BsyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kml4jUoEmHUUXVU1c7AViVp4FPM02sigk8d9DK0mLzY=; b=lqP4bF5V1bpXT950u7LnImQSOl7H2vrrCLbCLyISRCfILIqftTHeqnqvSty11/6hSp sMsJM/jyniY16OdiHzpzenn18pupbPqnihvNYSPbPZJuwEEOA9yIO2znCUxO/n9NK6Ly OWURA4LXCXTAoyRYdOLF3VIcDSWNC1zy4nF8zoe6tUsAKECBVZKgUpFsMVkfBNXJeIYa WoZoQPPU/r3TuF7mWt9fTlmn8vlm8m1HIvgH6Vbm+f+PsLou5ugR9xSaTxfAe4Pfpuh/ zNykLYZN7ixwLwJhDM9CNI+kqVRKjTErPt5SCN8iycpZ5w9lB3pGKEuVIHZWJCDZZD37 HSrg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUBYHS0XoI4n/YEhy1aHlCuhlhE5R3ZiWBBAqzWJ2TvdHPcgATp T3VOT3ahVbcWYMWFXXsWjrDTTQXb6bdRQpooy1Q8GA== X-Received: by 2002:a81:1186:: with SMTP id 128mr50033634ywr.181.1559061561339; Tue, 28 May 2019 09:39:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190526061100.21761-1-amir73il@gmail.com> <20190526061100.21761-5-amir73il@gmail.com> <20190528161829.GD5221@magnolia> <20190528163110.GG5221@magnolia> In-Reply-To: <20190528163110.GG5221@magnolia> From: Amir Goldstein Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 19:39:10 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] vfs: add missing checks to copy_file_range To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Dave Chinner , Christoph Hellwig , Olga Kornievskaia , Luis Henriques , Al Viro , linux-fsdevel , linux-xfs , Linux NFS Mailing List , CIFS , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Dave Chinner Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 7:31 PM Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 07:26:29PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 7:18 PM Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 09:10:55AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > > > > Like the clone and dedupe interfaces we've recently fixed, the > > > > copy_file_range() implementation is missing basic sanity, limits and > > > > boundary condition tests on the parameters that are passed to it > > > > from userspace. Create a new "generic_copy_file_checks()" function > > > > modelled on the generic_remap_checks() function to provide this > > > > missing functionality. > > > > > > > > [Amir] Shorten copy length instead of checking pos_in limits > > > > because input file size already abides by the limits. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner > > > > Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein > > > > --- > > > > fs/read_write.c | 3 ++- > > > > include/linux/fs.h | 3 +++ > > > > mm/filemap.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 3 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c > > > > index f1900bdb3127..b0fb1176b628 100644 > > > > --- a/fs/read_write.c > > > > +++ b/fs/read_write.c > > > > @@ -1626,7 +1626,8 @@ ssize_t vfs_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in, > > > > if (file_inode(file_in)->i_sb != file_inode(file_out)->i_sb) > > > > return -EXDEV; > > > > > > > > - ret = generic_file_rw_checks(file_in, file_out); > > > > + ret = generic_copy_file_checks(file_in, pos_in, file_out, pos_out, &len, > > > > + flags); > > > > if (unlikely(ret)) > > > > return ret; > > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h > > > > index 89b9b73eb581..e4d382c4342a 100644 > > > > --- a/include/linux/fs.h > > > > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h > > > > @@ -3050,6 +3050,9 @@ extern int generic_remap_checks(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in, > > > > struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out, > > > > loff_t *count, unsigned int remap_flags); > > > > extern int generic_file_rw_checks(struct file *file_in, struct file *file_out); > > > > +extern int generic_copy_file_checks(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in, > > > > + struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out, > > > > + size_t *count, unsigned int flags); > > > > extern ssize_t generic_file_read_iter(struct kiocb *, struct iov_iter *); > > > > extern ssize_t __generic_file_write_iter(struct kiocb *, struct iov_iter *); > > > > extern ssize_t generic_file_write_iter(struct kiocb *, struct iov_iter *); > > > > diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c > > > > index 798aac92cd76..1852fbf08eeb 100644 > > > > --- a/mm/filemap.c > > > > +++ b/mm/filemap.c > > > > @@ -3064,6 +3064,59 @@ int generic_file_rw_checks(struct file *file_in, struct file *file_out) > > > > return 0; > > > > } > > > > > > > > +/* > > > > + * Performs necessary checks before doing a file copy > > > > + * > > > > + * Can adjust amount of bytes to copy > > > > > > That's the @req_count parameter, correct? > > > > Correct. Same as generic_remap_checks() > > Ok. Would you mind updating the comment? > OK. Thanks, Amir.