Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp1411903ybi; Thu, 30 May 2019 17:24:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyNY7yglbQ0kL5Zo8AXxMXFOsJOtPEGvr9LQ/2Uuwy2YXVp7JLrJXQuxiq5+Jlw/er9BPqt X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:7147:: with SMTP id g7mr6071447pjs.42.1559262288237; Thu, 30 May 2019 17:24:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1559262288; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=W/YO/toLonH7Jzv8ZTDSqgLtQ3JfZvNPO9r+pArWif2Hdz0lwzUUlRbN/cSAyALLu4 Za2k+5m7vGXElaOJnFobqdZv5+NXW1/1A1rzjSW3GyTG2l9Ygd5hZVauJlO6k/Zz0prc MuPUS8MwMTGAFy6KfnxQ4FIrrEBxC5rtMo/jBEtlW9lz2HSN6b0MNDuNx26/WyYcOuPF xgqvX/eWRwAv/4laU0jPwHaGzwMXz8IgtlnyJ4uYsliQb+sU0+WV/1U+Mzf3iyXkjLhq AK8q17PBEY+wbaEcgMxdXlunCOqOl3R/Ho4rtmLFTDVLXUAg9XnIC0VOvUQHY5EFi3vt z6Ig== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:from:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:date; bh=AIgCB+2yppm5aXmYATLa5BbnW48SptiZ2WpkDoO7aNk=; b=nbw9hET9v4phSRkeFFga81dhflA7UdkzqakSNx0thtjyJli2vuHXbM0KLEHvp4eVzM y3gkvpuRM81xreXcppsvQZmnyZKvCZrdzcFfzys+xxbSordHC89hKjKts6m6UkSENuwe xgSozu+wL3K3KyPCTm3vqhLOX6S6C5D4g8FODyYM7Fg3Md0kYqOqAPvXFAY5Pt9dABL2 8XvDuhvW0f/+v+0YV50VHVKhp6wdhSFvjpjZFsr/VOzfDzs5e3GaPFd+aibeKnpxkOUc mM21AFcCS6FX/b1L/6BzJdqGoilR5Mv7AfFlFvTVjjuNMPSpwckDX+PHn7xcCyiF/zWt 9e8w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 91si4422166pld.334.2019.05.30.17.24.32; Thu, 30 May 2019 17:24:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726131AbfEaAYa (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 30 May 2019 20:24:30 -0400 Received: from fieldses.org ([173.255.197.46]:41378 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726045AbfEaAYa (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 May 2019 20:24:30 -0400 Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id 47BED1C18; Thu, 30 May 2019 20:24:30 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 20:24:30 -0400 To: NeilBrown Cc: Olga Kornievskaia , Chuck Lever , Schumaker Anna , Trond Myklebust , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Multiple network connections for a single NFS mount. Message-ID: <20190531002430.GC24802@fieldses.org> References: <155917564898.3988.6096672032831115016.stgit@noble.brown> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <155917564898.3988.6096672032831115016.stgit@noble.brown> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) From: bfields@fieldses.org (J. Bruce Fields) Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:41:28AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > This patch set is based on the patches in the multipath_tcp branch of > git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/nfs-2.6.git > > I'd like to add my voice to those supporting this work and wanting to > see it land. > We have had customers/partners wanting this sort of functionality for > years. In SLES releases prior to SLE15, we've provide a > "nosharetransport" mount option, so that several filesystem could be > mounted from the same server and each would get its own TCP > connection. > In SLE15 we are using this 'nconnect' feature, which is much nicer. For what it's worth, we've also gotten at least one complaint of a performance regression on 4.0->4.1 upgrade because a user was depending on the fact that a 4.0 client would use multiple TCP connections to a server with multiple IP addresses. (Whereas in the 4.1 case the client will recognize that the addresses point to the same server and share any preexisting session.) --b.